View Single Post
Old 05-12-2004, 11:44   #65
BBKing
R.I.P.
 
BBKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
BBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny starBBKing has a nice shiny star
Send a message via ICQ to BBKing
Re: Merger happening in early 2005!!

Quote:
I don't think so somehow. Is that the 2003 report you are refering to? I have not seen one in 2004...
It's a 4/12/2004 report, I wrote it and it works in real-time. So I do think so, somehow. And it's not per UBR port either, I do know the difference between nodes and upstreams. It would be completely daft to have node<>upstream 1-1 relationships, too. So we don't.

Quote:
When digital was launched in orig ntl areas and cable modems for that matter the return path was combined at the 2 ring level, so it was only possible to track a set-top down to approx one of 16 nodes
Odd - I can track it down to cabinet within two or three seconds.
BBKing is offline   Reply With Quote