View Single Post
Old 17-09-2012, 12:05   #110
Vieil Homme
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 461
Vieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud ofVieil Homme has much to be proud of
Re: Hillsborough Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
I'm aware my interpretation of some legal jargon is my own and may not relate to actual law however I do not see Hillsborough as an 'accident' in any way. My interpretation of that word is an incident to which nobody can be directly blamed. I see an 'accident' as "one of those things" or "couldn't be helped".

From the limited information I've read about April 15th 1989 I'd say the whole thing could have been avoided.
I think we are falling into the trap as if this happened today. Then I would agree it would not be an accident but the event happened in 1989 when the police communication was far from good. Today the Police have CCTV and a digital closed radio system.

We don't know the truth because the truth has been covered by lies to cover mistakes made by senior officers on the day who had a few moments to give an order to open a gate.

Accident = an unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury. Yes I know that big word death is missing.
Vieil Homme is offline   Reply With Quote