[Sparkle]

Originally Posted by Damien

Doesn't mean anything. We're not saying he is guilty, we're saying he should face the legal process to decide such a thing. He can never be found guilty if he isn't brought to a court.

To most people, that really goes without saying but I guess in your case it doesn't. What you are implying, is that since Assange has delayed returning to Sweden, then we can jump to conclusions. I don't think so.

We do have the fact that the US haven't started an extradition request.

Already addressed in my previous post above.

We also know they could have done so here if they wanted do. So we're meant to lend credence to your conspiracy because they 'may' be facts we don't know about.

Rubbish. Without the facts you're speculation about Assange's actions are nothing but hear'say, and possibly libel.
And for your information, its not that there "may" be facts we don't know about, we "genuinely" don't have them !

Personally I think you're Assange. It's impossible to know. We don't have all the facts.

Its not just that we don't have all the facts Damian, its that we have "too few facts" to draw any definitive conclusions.

No. Same ramifications. Also we would have to approve the extradition request anyway because you can't have a third-party (Sweden) extradite someone without the permission of the first-party (UK).

Completely irrelevant. I was talking about the US extraditing Assange from the UK to the US (instead of to Sweden), and you're telling me the third party requires the first party's permission. You don't say.

Where are these facts in your post?

I already stated that we don't have them, and I for one never claimed to have the facts. Nice try though, even if you do choose to throw your toys out the pram at my insistence you can't have a virtual Assange lynching because you don't have the facts to draw any definitive conclusions.