Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkle
As far as I'm concerned, and any self respecting human being should be concerned, Assange is innocent until proven guilty. He is not yet in Sweden, and he might not be for many months to speak (again) with investigators. He is STILL innocent until proven guilty.
|
Doesn't mean anything. We're not saying he is guilty, we're saying he should face the legal process to decide such a thing. He can never be found guilty if he isn't brought to a court.
Quote:
|
Anyway, as far as the US being behind the Assange extradition is concerned, its impossible to know if this is true as we don't have the facts.
|
We do have the fact that the US haven't started an extradition request. We also know they could have done so here if they wanted do. So we're meant to lend credence to your conspiracy because they 'may' be facts we don't know about.
Personally I think you're Assange. It's impossible to know. We don't have all the facts.
Quote:
|
Its been mentioned that if the US wants him then they could just have him extradited from here, well yes they could. But not if they've got a water board with Assange's name on it, then that might not be so simple....If they plan on forcibly extracting information from him, then the UK is a tinder box of future legal ramifications. Best let him leave the UK and deal with him later.
|
No. Same ramifications. Also we would have to approve the extradition request anyway because you can't have a third-party (Sweden) extradite someone without the permission of the first-party (UK).
Quote:
|
There are 13 pages of "discussion" here based on very few facts at all. In this thread I've seen more twisting of facts than factual discussion.
|
Where are these facts in your post?