Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf
They are suggesting they can declare that the embassy is no longer an embassy and then go in to nab Assange. That is unheard of in the diplomatic protocol and is likely to raise a few eyebrows around the world, as it means that the UK isn't playing by the diplomatic rules that the rest of the world plays by.
.
|
That is what was mentioned today on radio 2 ,declaring the building "not an embassy" removing Assange and then declaring the building an embassy again is fraught with problems and basically makes the idea of Embassies being a particular countries soil worthless and if the UK ever did that it would certainly raise a few eye brows ,
imagine if we ever tried that on the US embassy