View Single Post
Old 10-08-2012, 16:14   #129
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Is BT a threat to Virgin Media

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring View Post
And yet I don't get any less enjoyment out of watching something in SD than I do when watching something in SD; whether one is technically "superior" or not.

Which was my point. Which I think you knew
If the content is good , I agree you can enjoy in SD however as PB said the format is inferior. Some channels have better bit rates than others , Universal was always a poor SD picture , also didnt you say your flatscreen was only 32" the larger you go the more HD becomes preferable.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote