Thread: General Sky Sports pricing dispute: appeal ruling looms
View Single Post
Old 09-08-2012, 10:52   #128
LexDiamond
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Berks
Services: Sky+HD, Sky Unlimited BB and Sky landline
Posts: 784
LexDiamond has reached the bronze age
LexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze age
Re: Sky Sports pricing dispute: appeal ruling looms
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
Depends what you mean by that.

I'm sure, if Virgin chucked enough money at Sky, they could have Sky Atlantic and Sports 3/4 HD. However VM always have to consider what any channel addition may do the cost of subscription, and whether it's worth doing.

Premier Sports is an example of where Virgin Media were quite happy to do business, just not on the terms the channel wanted due to them not thinking it was the best value way for the business and their customers.
I agree. VM probably are at optimal levels in terms of the price they charge and channels they offer.

But that is very different to what is being said on this thread regarding Sky not playing game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone View Post
Oh but l have read it but the trouble is certain posters will put their own rose tinted glasses on and slant it to suit their own biased views on it.
I take it then that you did not actually bother reading it then.

You really need to stop accusing other people. Paragraph 29 clearly states that Sky were more willing to do business than counterparties yet you keep accusing others of lying.
LexDiamond is offline   Reply With Quote