|
Re: Sky Sports pricing dispute: appeal ruling looms
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexDiamond
Directly from the findings:
In point 16 it says that Sky was wrong for questioning Ofcom's authority.
Furthet in point 19 Sky is proven wrong again on its basis of contention.
But then if you read point 28, the conclusion was basically that Ofcom had no clue as to what actually happened.
Point 30 then states that they found no evidence that Sky is against the wholesale of its channels.
Point 32 is the killer blow. It says that the assertion that Sky is against the supply to cable is unfounded.
This is damning evidence for VM. The evidence shows that VM are lacking in bringing services to its platform.
|
And what services dear Lex in your mind are lacking as this just sounds just like another anti-Virgin post in my mind.
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|