Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobes
Tell me if I'm wrong lol
The regulator believes that Ofcom had, on the whole, ever right to tell SKY that they had to lower the price of Sky Sports to it's competitors but they found the evidence OFCOM gave for those reasons to be incorrect/misleading.
So in conclusion SKY both won and lost!
|
That is correct.
Basically Sky won. But not for the reasons they contested. Ofcom was wrong to begin with. Sky had no justification to fight the appeal on the grounds they did. But too many people jumped on the bandwagon and thought Sky had lost, while ignoring the bigger picture and the fact that Sky had nothing to answer in the first place.
It seems a bit silly to me that Sky can be judged to be wrong when they had nothing to answer in the first place!