[Sirius]

Originally Posted by gj4009

Sky won the appeal, whats more the judgment extract notes about how virgin and others were the ones making things difficult.

Ofcom has attributed responsibility for the failure to reach agreement
largely to Sky’s failure to engage constructively with its counterparties. However
the evidence shows that Sky did, on the whole, engage constructively. On the other
hand its counterparties by no means always did so, and in our view regulatory
gaming on the part of some of Sky’s counterparties played a much more important
role in the commercial negotiations and their progress (or lack of it) than Ofcom has
recognised.

Ahhh glad im believing in better with my TV provider

http://www.catribunal.org.uk/237-654...Media-Inc.html

The Tribunal has concluded that neither of Sky’s and FAPL’s two grounds of challenge to Ofcom’s jurisdiction to take action under section 316 in the present case succeeds.

does this not show that Sky lost