View Single Post
Old 05-08-2012, 16:16   #57
Sirius
Grumpy Fecker
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 17,032
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: Sky Sports & Movies price increases

Quote:
Originally Posted by RB2004 View Post
I think the only solution, which I heard ofcom considering at one point, would be to split up bskyb into 2 companies, distribution and tv they said this would create a fairer competition environment as vm, bt, topuptv etc would have access to all the same channels as sky.. No exclusive sky only channels like Atlantic that give them a competitive advantage.. Especially when like me I have witnessed sky salesman going around selling sky to vm customers on the premise they have channels vm don't when the truth is the only reason vm don't have is because sky won't release them.

Also it would make pricing more competitive, as sky would have to buy the channels at the same rate as bt and vm and topuptv, so prices would become more competitive and reasonable.
Gets my vote
__________________
The UK is now the regime of Kim Jong Starmer the UK's dictator
Sirius is online now   Reply With Quote