Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
I think the points Damien is trying to make are
1) that Paedophile gangs can be bolack, white and asian.
2) the majority of paedophile female victims tend to be white girls (that's whats reported in most cases)
The question he is asking is did the asian gang target white girls because they are a) racist, or b) because they identified them as being the most vunerable targets they could find.
|
No. In the original post Damien asked no question. He made an inaccurate post trying to compare two stories that were entirely different
Quote:
|
A good article in The Guardian after a similar case in which a predominately white gang groomed and sexually abused children, a case which got no where near the same level of press coverage as the Asian gang did.
|
and made the point that this story didn't get the same level as coverage as the Rochdale one, it didn't for obvious reasons.
Regardless of his mistake, he then went on for several posts seemingly trying make a point that the men
guilty of rape and abuse in Rochdale were somehow given a rough deal?????????
They were guilty and now they're banged up. Everyone had a right to be angry, and the story had a right to be publicised, and we had a right to be outraged. Regardless of the colour of the men and regardless of the colour of the girls.
I fail to see what kind of point or distinction between this crime and other similar crimes Damien was trying to make.