Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
I am not a Motorola fan, it is a poor man's Cisco
|
They are well better than either of the present illegitimised devices presently in use namely the VMNG300 and the Superhub, and surprisingly the mainstream devices like Ronseal did exactly what they say on the tin.
UBEE/Ambit and Netgear gave Virgin Media cheap nasty equipment and both went laughing all the way to the bank.
You want decent kit you go with a mainstream manufacturer and they did test Cisco devices as well but went with the camels now in use.
I do not understand why you would want to support a third rate device when we all know the is better kit out there.
---------- Post added at 08:10 ---------- Previous post was at 08:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth
I'm sure if VM went to Motorola and said "we want the SBG900/1 and want it with VM branding on the case", Motorola would say "if you're buying them in the hundreds of thousands or millions you can have any branding you want on them".
Hey presto - new superhub that works and VM save face. Aren't BT now on homehub 3? Introducing new versions doeasnt seem to have done them any harm.
Cheers
Grim
|
They never did that with any previous Motorola devices and the would be no need now as bringing out a branded device would make them look like they they actually care, if it was branded no one would trust them not to have fiddled with it in some way remember the CG3100 series the Superhub is based on has 7 or 8 antenna built in unlike the the 2 stamp sized one fitted inside the back of the device.