Thread: 100M 100Mb/VMNG300/SuperHub
View Single Post
Old 15-07-2012, 18:31   #20
Nopanic
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,249
Nopanic has reached the bronze age
Nopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze ageNopanic has reached the bronze age
Re: 100Mb/VMNG300/SuperHub
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
There is no issue of averages. "can only" explicitly states it cannot ever support more under any circumstances. Which is patently false.
My post says average, so thus I'm asking about averages .. stop trying to attack me ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skie View Post
While I think Colonel Maxipads was a bit ott, it is correct that the statement is pretty false.

But of course if VM insist on claiming the superhub has "unbeatable wireless" and that their network is so good, we already know to take any statements from them with a dose of salt. Probably enough salt to kill an elephant.

That and how would they have tested them? We already know they 300 can handle 100meg speeds, so getting anything lower is likely to be network related and something which would also affect the superhub.
Sounds logical to me.
Nopanic is offline   Reply With Quote