Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
I'd argue that the reason it was a separate trial is because as far as I am aware, the victim came forward after the grooming trial. Similarly if a girl came forward now in relation to the grooming case it would be a spearate trial.
Are you saying that no more victims of the original grooming trial exist? And if they come forward they wont be treated as new trials?
Raaping someone for almost 15 years has quite a strong indication of grooming does it not? He also let other people have sex with her/forced her to have sex with other people.
|
Where does it say that? He was the only one charged with raping her. She told the police after the grooming investigation started, not after the trial started.
Quote:
|
"We already knew Ahmed was an integral part of the Rochdale grooming case - now we can also say his horrific campaign of abuse began many years ago with the systematic rape of this one victim," she said.
|
How would things like alcohol feature in a girl that young.
Quote:
|
She said she couldn't remember how old she was the first time Ahmed raped her, but she knew she was so young she still had to stand on a chair to reach the sink.
|
Quote:
|
He told the jury that fellow Pakistanis would regard him as having “infested” their community by sleeping with a white girl. “It’s not just them who are racist. We are racist too”.
|
Quote:
|
Ahmed blamed the white community for allowing teenage girls to go around unsupervised, so that at a young age they were “trained” in both sex and drinking.
|