Thread: 100M Will VM ever match BT's upload speeds?
View Single Post
Old 20-06-2012, 10:26   #51
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Will VM ever match BT's upload speeds?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
Yes they are
I agree.

---------- Post added at 10:26 ---------- Previous post was at 10:23 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr View Post
therefore implying anything up to 24 months is quite legal and valid

I am aware that as part of that ruling 12 month contracts must also be offered, but I can't find anything to say that's the only thing that is actually legal
At the basic level contracts of any length can be legal and valid. Contracts of over 24 months in the communications industry tend to be unfair (Unfair terms in contracts legislation) and detrimental to consumer interests, but not necessarily so.

B2B mobile and fixed line contracts frequently still operate on 24 or 36-month minimum terms. If >24 month MT contracts weren't legal, BT and VM wouldn't be operating some of their most lucrative business on them.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote