Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Firstly, l think that £1.00 would buy Rangers as l don't think any club in Scotland is worth much more.
I might be old and grumpy, but l cannot understand why BT Vision got involved in the bidding for EPL rights in the first place.
I know that Sky and ESPN have interest in BT Vision, but the only one that is going to make money will be ESPN, VM and Sky as they will have to buy from BT, am l right.
And then we will get stitched up as customers.
|
We have no idea what BT's strategy is for the next 4 years and BT wouldn't of accidentally paid out £700million + on football rights. We will just have to wait and see what happens.
---------- Post added at 23:34 ---------- Previous post was at 23:28 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Actually, yes, Sky isn't going to fall behind after all as it switches to a cable system to catch up with Virgin Media! There will soon be no need for satellites in respect of TV!
|
Satellites are a very cheap way of covering a massive area for distributing Tv channels.
Cable systems are just to expensive to maintain, expand, upgrade and are to open to interference/noise issues. The also have a very big carbon footprint.