View Single Post
Old 12-06-2012, 10:33   #16
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Websites to be forced to identify trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring View Post
I wasn't want to say anything


There are clear rules as to what is considered a libellous/defamatory comment.

This is an extract from "Essential Radio Journalism" by Paul Chantler & Peter Stewart. (Ch 12, P207)
See, that's the problem:

Quote:
The legal definition of defamation says that something is libellous if it:

Exposes anyone to hatred, ridicule or contempt.
Now, if I were to say 'I fart in your general direction', this could expose you to ridicule. Who is going to be the judge of what offences are serious enough to warrant handing over an IP address? Do victims have to go to court, to force web masters to hand over IP addresses (as I think they can now), or is a single complaint going to be sufficient? Who is going to decide if an 'offence' has been committed?
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote