Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
Virgin spent £13 billion on their broadband network but Sky for a long while piggybacked on to BT's network and have spent a miniscule amount in comparison so why should Virgin share their network with Sky?.  |
And SKY pay for their content..yet you think they should let Virgin have it
Seems somewhat unfair...it is ok for Virgin to spend money..and keep it exclusive, but Sky is not allowed to do the same?
---------- Post added at 18:55 ---------- Previous post was at 18:53 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
Well its not up to me to tell you but there are many areas where Sky overall has a inferior service but the areas in which they are stronger in have more to do with monopolistic tendacies and a uncompetitive attitude in with-holding channels and content from other providers and in that the UK pay-TV industry is still unfairly balanced in Sky’s favour.
|
read above...you are saying it is ok for Virgin..but not for SKY