Thread: [Update] The News Corp scandal
View Single Post
Old 25-05-2012, 17:57   #1741
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,731
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: [Update] The News Corp scandal
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
What had owning 3 newspapers with no overlap got the slightest thing to do with owning a broadcaster, that he already owns a large chunk of. Any decision was BEFORE Leveson, so how could the decision be influenced either way by something hadn't fully come to light. Even then, how is it that somebody(Blair & Brown) can successfully claim ignorance of what is going on, in their name and in their office, but somebody else(ie not a Labour MP) gets blamed for something occurring on the other side of an ocean. Murdoch gets the 'blame' anyway with anything connected to BSkyB, so what would change?
You would be livid if this was Labour then?

They are not absolved but this incident took place under the current government so they are in the firing line.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote