[devilincarnate]

Am I reading too much in to this

BSkyB bid adjudication
In his evidence, Mr Stephens said he had been "particularly struck" by Mr Hunt's understanding of the proper processes required of his department in his quasi-judicial role over the BSkyB bid.

"To reach a fair and unbiased decision was the secretary of state's overriding concern to my observation, throughout the process."

Mr Stephens also said "there was a marked change in the natural style and approach" of Mr Hunt that he believed was being picked up by everyone, including Mr Smith.

Speaking about the role of Mr Smith in this process, Mr Stephens told the Leveson Inquiry that - as permanent secretary - he was not responsible for the conduct or discipline of special advisors, and he could not dismiss them.

He described the position of a special adviser as "rather unique", adding that Mr Hunt and Mr Smith had a "close relationship".

Mr Stephens said he had assumed Mr Smith was talking to someone with access to chief executive of News Corp, but did not "recall" knowing the extent of their discussion, just that they had contact over "unexceptional" matters of procedure.

Asked if he now believed he had had too much confidence in the judgement of Mr Smith, Mr Stephens said: "With the benefit of hindsight, clearly yes."

"At the time, I thought he showed good understanding of the role, good judgement and was careful in how he undertook the role."

Continue reading the main story
“
Start Quote

This is ammunition for the culture secretary's critics who say his mind was made up to give the Murdochs what they wanted”

Nick Robinson
BBC political editor
A question of judgement
Mr Stephens previously refused to confirm to MPs whether he gave permission for Mr Smith to be the point of contact with News Corp during the BSkyB takeover bid process.

He later said in a letter that he was simply "aware and content" with the arrangement.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18202042