Thread: General Underhand devious Sky
View Single Post
Old 17-05-2012, 21:18   #65
Dave42
cf.mega poster
 
Dave42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jarrow Tyne & Wear
Services: 360 box
Posts: 5,853
Dave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronze
Dave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronze
Re: Underhand devious Sky

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy_m View Post
Virgin do compete with Sky, in some areas such as broadband and on demand they are arguably ahead. They've chosen not to compete on linear channels. I understand the need for regulation when competition can't be achieved, but two companies who choose to operate in different ways shouldn't be bought together by regulation just because one of them doesn't have access to a particular channel - you end up with 2 companies offering near identical products competing solely on price. That just results in cuts to quality.
there can't compete on channels as sky pay very big money to make sure no one esle can compete with them
Dave42 is offline   Reply With Quote