Quote:
Originally Posted by adzii_nufc
Whilst Hazard is the younger, faster and all round better player now he still cant pick out ridiculous passes that Scholesy can.
He can't tackle worth a damn but he makes up for that with awesome vision and passing, He can leather a shot from nowhere too.
|
Different players really. Hazard is more of an attacking midfielder or winger than creative play-maker. More of a Messi than a Xavi, more of a Ronaldo than a Scholes. He is closer to a RVP style player than a Wilshere style. (I could go on!).
---------- Post added at 08:43 ---------- Previous post was at 08:39 ----------
Anyway according to the Mirror Manchester City are 'closing in' on RVP:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footba...-persie-833012
£250,000 a week. They already have 4 expensive strikers but they want more! It really is a case of not being happy with what they have if they can deprive their rivals, if Arsenal could even be called that anymore, good players. Same with Hazard, whilst he is a great player they spent £25 million on Nasri last year and they have David Silva so why Hazard? To stop United getting him. They are buying up all the talent they can with a limitless supply of cash to remove any chance of competition to them.
I would rather RVP goes to United than City then at least someone could, maybe, compete with them.