View Single Post
Old 13-05-2012, 11:18   #1688
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: [Update] The News Corp scandal

See its osbourne turn to be dragged deeper into the cesspool.

Secret meeting with mordocks in country estate

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...-murdoch-bskyb

Stuart spot on signed was under similar rules.

Amazing how lapsed the countries top MP's civil servants brass become. I can only assume they have similar rules so why they breaching it.

Just being with those could be enough to constitute conflict of interest.

Its does not matter if sensitive issues was discussed or not there is oportunity for it. Fact the mere mention should be sackable offense. If they force resignation on civil servants should they not walk themselves for same reasons.

Therefore hunt, cameron, osbourne should be tendering resignations. You cant demand the same action to civil servants if you dont go yourself for same offence.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote