Quote:
Originally Posted by Halcyon
I think if the user saved images or had bookmarks full of these sites then it would prove intent to view them.
However as others have said, you can easily be sent a link to a site, realise the content of it and then leave. That should not be enough to convict anyone.
|
But that isn't what happened. The guy went down already for having a collection of child porn. The Judge clearly states that the defendant must know that those images would be stored in the cache to be convicted for the images that were stored there. There was nothing about intent to view them as he clearly intended to do both by his own admission ('research') and because he already had images stored elsewhere.