Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
If the evidence as presented to the jury and in public was only strong enough to convict 7 of them, then coming to the same conclusion is not that different from having a jury of 1000 people coming to that same conclusion. It's when a jury decision defies all the evidence that there should be suspicion.
One of those acquitted was only charged with conspiracy, which tends to be difficult to prove.
|
You mis understand ,how would he know that the jury had reached a verdict at all on 7 of the defendants ,he should have had no idea if any verdict had been reached on any of the defendants untill they were announced i court