Quote:
Originally Posted by _wtf_
Would suggest I've done it earlier.
That last paragraph of that post adds nothing to my argument I merely point people to a site where their views can be taken into account. I am not bothering to go through the lot again but there are enough remarks made for me to believe that some people who have replied do see it that way, e.g. post 295. Then had I been a moderator I would have pulled that post up as it could be construed as libellous  |
'earlier' would be in post #213 when someone made a comment about VPNs being used to avoid being caught downloading copyright material, you stated (quite accurately, but not relevant to his comment) that p2p could be used to legally distribute material - if it was legally shareable, why bother with a VPN?
As for Carl's comment, whilst slightly inappropriate, your interpretation differs from mine - I read it as copyright infringers (which is not something you have ever stated you have done, hence his post being inappropriate) not file-sharers....
btw, I agree that the business model needs reforming, but also, as stated previously, have strong views on copyright infringement.