Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Leveson also allows him time for it to blow over. He will go in front of the inquiry and be well prepared. The questions won't stray too far from the inquiry's remit, Leverson has made that quite clear on a number of occasions, and that reduces the focus on if Hunt breached the rules.
Then Cameron can counter any calls for a investigation by claiming it wouldn't be proper to 'pre-judge the results of the inquiry' and accuse the opposition of irresponsibility by trying to do so. Then when Leveson delivers his report it will have minimal focus on Hunt as it's not really a key part of the inquiry and it won't report on if Hunt breached the Ministerial code as that isn't it's place to do so.
So, yes, they are trying to get him to appear before Leveson because the moment he does so then they would have seen off the danger.
|
Or worse we get position where critical information destroyed.
For me it might be better to bring in those who would investigate this with leverson. I am sure only reason leverson took his stance as its another person job.
In meantime worried evidence maybe buried/destroyed.
If people dont think could happen nobody thought nixon would goto lengths to protect himself.
I actually think this whole rotten mess goes alot further we think leverson just chomping edges.
There something very wrong with this inner circle of power hopefully leveson smashes it wide open. Will he be allowed to go too deep.