Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
I think I am going to have a heart attach, Peter is dissing the shub  |
It does its job adequately but not as good as an off the shelf piece of kit, I get almost 32Mb from mine wired.
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
that has got nothing to go with it at all. My Linksys router has got internal antennae and it kicks ass. The problem is the whole ethos around cost and not caring about quality, especially when they are/were forcing you to use it without any other option (pre-modem mode). Even if the shub has external antennae, there have been tonnes of other problems seperate from wireless which should not have existed in the first place and took them donkeys to fix.
|
You have seen the screenshots of the 2 quite small antenna fitted at the back of the device unlike your Linksys or many other devices with multiple antenna around the casing.
---------- Post added at 09:36 ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
Upstream bonding compatible firmware is already present on other cable networks.
The modem the VMNG300 is a rebranded and recased version of is deployed on a number of networks including the largest cable company in the world, there's no reports of massive amounts of issues, unlike the Superhub which Comhem users of its unbranded version, the Netgear CG3100D, report as being garbage as well and have many of the same issues with it in router mode.
|
VMNG300 without 8 downstreams and the Superhub with mini antenna inside at the back makes for relatively poor equipment and any firmware upgrade is going to be years to late for either device.
You buy the incorrect kit for your flagship devices and it kicks you in the face, even the first planned replacement by Hauwei failed in testing now another version is in the planning ad testing stages but it may or may not have external antenna because they are worried about it not looking pretty, that was on the intranet.