Thread: 50M Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
View Single Post
Old 20-04-2012, 02:06   #1179
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
The same packet loss spike pattern is clearly showing on your graph so I'm not sure why you're saying it didn't affect yours...

As for the speed, what are you testing it with? Is it consistently poor or only so at certain times of day? I'm quite surprised it'd be worse than 40, as the only difference is increasing your speed cap. There's no change of technology, channel, frequency, etc. and I'm not seeing congestion on your graph either. P.S. Try the following speedtest: http://mcslhr.visualware.com/myspeed..._capspeed.html

---------- Post added at 02:06 ---------- Previous post was at 02:05 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry View Post
lovely VM core there qas
A lot are like that, some worse than others. They're just not programmed to respond to pings very fast on particular interfaces. It's a pattern common on particular Cisco kit.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote