View Single Post
Old 19-04-2012, 15:08   #69
LexDiamond
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Berks
Services: Sky+HD, Sky Unlimited BB and Sky landline
Posts: 784
LexDiamond has reached the bronze age
LexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze ageLexDiamond has reached the bronze age
Re: How should Virgin offer the Olympics to their customers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat View Post
VM should have anounced live channels on the same day as Sky did or within a very short time afterwards.

Why did VM delay the anouncment? If they had planned it from the start, why the delay?

I can think of several reasons, but they would be pure conjecture on my part and could be completely wrong. But one thing I am sure of, given a long history of Sky adding channels and VM not adding those same channels, that posters, making it clear from the start, that VM should do the same, was the right thing to do. I really can't see how that makes those posters general Whingers.
Your final paragraph agrees with what I initially said.

VM announced 100 days before the start of the start of the games. Suggesting VM delayed its announcement is pure conjecture.
LexDiamond is offline   Reply With Quote