Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry
Last time I checked I do not adovocate the forced removal of people to prison camps just because they slightly disagreed with the system, also I do adocate 100% nationlisation, 5 year plans, forced people to be moved to the rural areas and starved to death
Last time I checked I do not advocate the forced removal of people to prison camps just because they slightly disagreed with the system, also I do advocate 100% nationalisation, 5 year plans, forced people to be moved to the rural areas and starved to death and lastly, for their leaders to live a billionaire jet set lifestyle or even a dictatorship of the proletariat  
So you call anyone who is prepared to stand up for the rights of the working people as “idiots”, “loony left”, “Communists”, “Terrorists” and even “Extremist”, all the people you describe want better rights, better wages and better pensions for the working people, even it it also includes boosting the ego of those leaders
So while you defend a failed system, I defend a failed people  |
Are you now copying and pasting your rants?
You are comparing Russian communism to true communism. Russian communism wasn't true communism, because people were not equal, and the leadership oppressed anyone who didn't agree with them. And they used violence and oppression to carry out their agenda. This is much the same as the violence, terrorism, and murder that you advocate on your twitter and facebook posts.
In theory we would all like to be equal, and the wealth to be spread out across the population in a much fairer way. But a successful economy can never exist this way, because there would be no incentive to set up and grow successful companies if the owners were on similar wages to those who they employ on the shop floor. So British business wouldn't be competitive in a global marketplace. And if employment was 100% (including unproductive workers who don't want to work), just so that everyone had a job, then wage bills would go through the roof. And so would inflation due to massive production costs.
You really need to look at all your rants, and put them all together. And then work out how they could actually work in a successful economy. Because from the way most people with any common sense see it, there are far too many conflicts in your rants. And they haven't been worked out with any degree of intelligence.
Reforms are needed to improve the economy, and bring down unemployment. But they need to be properly thought out...unlike many of yours!
---------- Post added at 12:49 ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry
For God sake, it was Free Market Capitalism and Neo Liberal Democracy that caused it, the spending was there to keep the working people on side to a failed system |
So you don't agree with "Free Market Capitalism", which is the only way for a country to have a successful economy in a global market. And you don't agree with "Democracy", so you agree with a dictatorship that forces the nation to comply with their wishes?......this is sounding like communist Russia again
