Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
Nice condescending tone there  |
Pleasure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
I did not "change" anything. The title of the thread could be libellous.
|
Except your comment regarding libellous statements was in response to my comments to you about your comments, so there you go changing your terms of reference again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
I couldn't care less about random comments from anonymous forum users so wouldn't even think of taking any such action.
|
Sure?
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
I couldn't care less about random comments from anonymous forum users so wouldn't even think of taking any such action.
|
Yes, we've already established how empty your comments can be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
Oh please Yes, of course it's "ultimately up to the courts to decide" but you don't think VM are going to have a team of their own lawyers to advise them on whether what was posted is libellous or not and that they have a good chance of winning? Or do you think they're just going to go to court on a whim? |
I've left your bold in. I'll say it again as you still don't seem to understand. Only a court can say what is and is not libellous. All the legal advice any person or entity gets is just that - legal advice, nothing more and nothing less, and will always be until tested in court.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
Simple yes, but also entirely wrong. As usual, when you're posting about me, I might add  |
Oh please
(got that line from you - and think I'll use it for a day or two). You're making me shake my head in disappointment as I often do when I meet pupils of the King Canute School of Logic.
Cheers
Grim