OK Carl, I'll try and explain it in nice simple terms without the quotes so not to confuse you.
You started off by saying you take posts at face value and assume people mean what they say.
You then go on to say my reply was complete nonsense, and could be construed (to keep it simple that word means could be interpreted in a particular way) libellous.
Then when you're called on it you try and change from you have libelled me to an unidentified person/company might take exception. Oh and by the way as you love being Mr Pedantic you use the phrase "...may well decide to take it further if they decide that what you have posted is
libellous", well the last time I looked it was for the courts to decide if libel has occured not the individual or entity, but hey Carl don't let accuracy get in the way of pompusness.
So to answer your last post I just pointed out that you change your tune to suit.
Simple enough?
Cheers
Grim