View Single Post
Old 05-04-2012, 12:32   #50
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: How stupid is the water ban

one solution is rain harvesting.

We not just talking buts for gardening but full system turn to drinking water, toilet flushing showers.

http://www.rainwaterharvesting.co.uk/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainwater_harvesting

http://www.oas.org/DSD/publications/...ea59e/ch10.htm

Quote:
Quote:
Advantages
· Rainwater harvesting provides a source of water at the point where it is needed. It is owner operated and managed.

· It provides an essential reserve in times of emergency and/or breakdown of public water supply systems, particularly during natural disasters.


· The construction of a rooftop rainwater catchment system is simple, and local people can easily be trained to build one, minimizing its cost.


· The technology is flexible. The systems can be built to meet almost any requirements. Poor households can start with a single small tank and add more when they can afford them.


· It can improve the engineering of building foundations when cisterns are built as part of the substructure of the buildings, as in the case of mandatory cisterns.


· The physical and chemical properties of rainwater may be superior to those of groundwater or surface waters that may have been subjected to pollution, sometimes from unknown sources.


· Running costs are low.


· Construction, operation, and maintenance are not labor-intensive.
Disadvantages
· The success of rainfall harvesting depends upon the frequency and amount of rainfall; therefore, it is not a dependable water source in times of dry weather or prolonged drought.

· Low storage capacities will limit rainwater harvesting so that the system may not be able to provide water in a low rainfall period. Increased storage capacities add to construction and operating costs and may make the technology economically unfeasible, unless it is subsidized by government.


· Leakage from cisterns can cause the deterioration of load bearing slopes.


· Cisterns and storage tanks can be unsafe for small children if proper access protection is not provided.


· Possible contamination of water may result from animal wastes and vegetable matter.


· Where treatment of the water prior to potable use is infrequent, due to a lack of adequate resources or knowledge, health risks may result; further, cisterns can be a breeding ground for mosquitoes.


· Rainfall harvesting systems increase construction costs and may have an adverse effect on home ownership. Systems may add 30% to 40% to the cost of a building.


· Rainfall harvesting systems may reduce revenues to public utilities.
We could always filtration dirty waste water back to drink water like they do in space station although people will YUK wont do that.

this link if click top left & right got quite few alternatives.

http://www.oas.org/DSD/publications/....htm#TopOfPage

I always felt we backward nation water from paths go into gutters which got to the sea. A road system which runs to underground storage tanks.

http://www.oas.org/DSD/publications/....htm#TopOfPage

We got snow in scotland yet nowbody thought sending trucks bring it back down south dump it in storage.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote