Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
Making excuses for idiots like her is the problem .Some people are so used to the government telling them what to do they have forgotten how to think for themselves .I'll bet the stupid bint tries to sue the government for suggesting that it is a good idea to keep petrol in a jerrycan
---------- Post added at 17:17 ---------- Previous post was at 17:10 ----------
They can't work too many extra hours anyway due to HGV driving regulations so all that will happen is more agency workers will bought in with the required certification .Which by the way is one of the reasons why they want to strike ,apparently the certification required ,although exactly the same for agency,self employed and employed drivers is not good enough for agency staff,anyone else remember the last time a tanker blew up or a garage forcourt exploded because i can't remember a single occasion
|
I can only assume there ignoring the takagraph restriction.
Why dont the governemnt get those army lads they tell us they trained.
Now bit two minds on the issue one they literally lugging 40,000 petrol behind there cab once tiredness kicks in could be very dangerous.
They do get break at the refineries but at the destination they got lug pipes fit them discharge the fuel to correct tank. Tiredness here could loosely could make mistakes. Who picks the tab up on those fill up unleaded only get diesel.
Will the government pay for the damaged cars.
Its definate food for thought on this move do we want tired tanker drivers.
Lets not forget it will likely fourth or fifth day as issue goes further down.
Actually would the mmove actually increase the likelyhood strike going ahead as driver refuse to go beyond hours of safety.
Wonder if actually move is government calling driver bluff.
Go ahead it aint about safety all about extra money. Refuse they then left no doubt tanker drivers are concerned.