View Single Post
Old 30-03-2012, 15:18   #29
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: Fraud fears grow over contactless bank card technology

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymouse View Post
This sounds like a silly, obvious question, I know, but...why is this information transmitted unencrypted?!

And don't say it's because of cost - how much more does it cost the banks etc. in fraud claims? If they'd just ensure it's encrypted, end of problem...well, at least until some genius proves the Riemann Hypothesis, that is.
Its valid point however encryptions only go so far once system cracked you then have to change it suppose thats the expense.

Tetra was deemed uncrackable its now been cracked by maths lecturer at uni. Geniuses cant stop giving themselves the challenge of breaking the unbreakable. Not problem but usually that information finds it way in the wrong hands.

What man can do man can unlock.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote