|
Re: The Budget, March 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle
Interesting development about Osbourne.
He denied he top earner wont benefit but there some questionable doubts too this. He correct in sense to his MP's job but how much earns outside this position.
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/n...#ixzz1psfuqYo8
So its not in the realms he maybe qualify would be shocked Cameron not either as his ministerial pay £142,500. I would be shocked this is only income.
Nobody grudging there pay outside as long its own company dont conflict with policies. Still think Mp's pay way too high even if they run the country. Under current climate not deserved they should half it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle
dont understandyou hugh comments not alleged or acused anyone the paper article suggesting he maybe above the threshold. I am just posting it they raising whether he is considering the details they post.
Arthurgray50@blu you go too far sometimes but you make sense with those comments.
Go far say why did he not give us all below 15,000 or less earnings voucher for to buy british goods.
Puts it into companies instead of the businesses maybe put there cut into business. Stimulates british industry and stimulates the economy. Yanks did this to ofset credit crunch gave american citizens money to spend.
|
looks pretty much like allegations and accusations to me.....
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|