View Single Post
Old 22-03-2012, 21:42   #71
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,287
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: The Budget, March 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle View Post
Interesting development about Osbourne.

He denied he top earner wont benefit but there some questionable doubts too this. He correct in sense to his MP's job but how much earns outside this position.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/n...#ixzz1psfuqYo8



So its not in the realms he maybe qualify would be shocked Cameron not either as his ministerial pay £142,500. I would be shocked this is only income.

Nobody grudging there pay outside as long its own company dont conflict with policies. Still think Mp's pay way too high even if they run the country. Under current climate not deserved they should half it.
The rental income is recent enough not to have yet been assessed for tax.
Quote:
According to its published accounts, the company made a pre-tax loss in 2010-11 and paid no dividends to shareholders.
As for the PM.
Quote:
Downing Street has refused to confirm whether the prime minister pays the top rate of tax.
So what are you alleging, that is backed up with facts?

nomadking is online now