View Single Post
Old 22-03-2012, 20:47   #65
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: The Budget, March 2012

Interesting development about Osbourne.

He denied he top earner wont benefit but there some questionable doubts too this. He correct in sense to his MP's job but how much earns outside this position.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/n...#ixzz1psfuqYo8

Quote:
He only needs earn 15,500 to push him into top bracket.
But he made no mention of his rental income - or his stake in the bespoke wallpaper business Osborne & Little today.
He also stands to benefit from a trust fund worth more than £4million - which will save him and other family beneficiaries an estimated £1.6 million in inheritance tax.
So its not in the realms he maybe qualify would be shocked Cameron not either as his ministerial pay £142,500. I would be shocked this is only income.

Nobody grudging there pay outside as long its own company dont conflict with policies. Still think Mp's pay way too high even if they run the country. Under current climate not deserved they should half it.
mertle is offline