View Single Post
Old 08-03-2012, 16:38   #1
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
First sign of Conservative dissatisfaction at Cameron/Osborne leadership

Not suprising really alot seeing the policies not really helping the economy neither going to be good for voters. The cracks are appearing as reality sets in that these idiots not got clue.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/gree...h-davidcameron

Gardian picked up on these articles one by the telgraph ed west saying boldy conservitives will lose next election thank god. Has scathing attack on duo's backward atitudes policies. Quoting Francis Maude’s speech critising the policies.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ed...015-thank-god/

Then we have James Dilingpole critism of cameron and osbourne giving public schools a bad name with snobish, spoilt and arrogant atitude.

Osbournes poor financial management of our nation. with fantasic quote from the spectator
Quote:
“Quantitative Easing is a transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich,” he says, “It floods banks with money, which they use to pay themselves bonuses. The banks have money, and assets, so they can borrow easily. The poor guy, who is unemployed and can't borrow, is not going to benefit from it.” The QE process pushes asset prices up, he says, which is great for those who own stocks, shares and expensive houses. “But the state is subsidising the rich. It is the top 1 per cent who benefit from Quantitative Easing, not the 99 per cent.”’
Here's how Bill Jamieson described "possibly the greatest gamble in British economic history."
Quote:
‘Low rates of interest are, of course, great news for a government which needs to borrow £4,000 a second — but not for savers who see the value of their nest egg destroyed by inflation. It hurts pension funds, so what we think we’re putting towards retirement will be worth far less. Companies see the value of their pension fund plunge — and have to top it up. This is what QE does: transfers wealth from savers to borrowers. If the Chancellor stood up and admitted as much, it would cause uproar. But because QE is a complex Bank of England mechanism with a boring name, no one much cares.We need not guess at its effects. The Bank’s own analysis has confirmed that the first £200 billion of QE pushed up inflation by anything from 1 to 2.6 percentage points. This was slipped out in the small print of a Bank report, barely making a ripple. Compare this to the political outcry which surrounded the 2.5 percentage point rise in VAT last January. Every household had to pay considerably more for shopping due to QE, too, and, as with VAT, it has hit the poorest households hardest.’
You could not argue there is something plainly wrong but like bull they carry on will both be here before the election somehow the murmurings will be volcano of dicontent.

We might not even ned lib dems the conservatives will remove the clowns for us.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote