[mertle]

RizzyKing dont think I am talking relation here.

What about HIGH RISK unemployed those with troubled lives ie drugs abuse, arson, stealing, shoplifting and GBH/ABH.

I accept everybody needs second chance it might even be behind some of them, great they turned life around. However forcing those types who have not deemed high risk. If those would be deemed so bad they exempt then why they done this. Then it would fill me with dread those currently troubled would be forced to work dangers and concequences of this fill me with dread.

You can you imagine drug junkie being forced to work in charity shop or firm going cold turkey for a fix or worse taking it in toilet. Will there be measures to make sure these individuals wont pose a danger and would never be able to get drugs on premises or knives.
How easy would to get friend to slip him his stuff after phone call desperation. It something forcing it there huge dangers involved. Social only see a Number they dont see the person his habits unless he know to the police but do they have access to records.

What about those people who troubled can get agressive violent do we want these in charities or shops.

I know its no defence but think government ought to be wary that there certain dangers.

Who would be responsible if irate customer gets stabbed or set upon. I am fearing there will be a flashpoint will government say sorry we never thought it would happen.


There those who would shop lift or steal would the companies want those near there business. I would think there HUGE risk of this happening while its JSA+Expenses no wage. The over bearing temptation to sneak off with something.

What about arsonist damn would tell social to naff off if I knew these types was coming to shop I owned. How many low lifes would be casing up premises for raids.

I wonder if this payback for those riots yet how many was unemployed.

I just showing that it maybe we should be careful that there will be some shady characters forced into this which I would worry about.