View Single Post
Old 26-02-2012, 23:29   #154
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Sainsbury's pull out of 'Work for your benefits scheme'

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
you mean the bit where i said i had doubts about companies making excess profits from work experience people and not offering anything in return .Since most companies have backed out that won't happen and since tesco are taking some of the people on as shown in later posts my fears have been alayed ,
But, then you start throwing words like lazy about when you're talking about those people. when some of them could have been in work for 2 or 3 years and been made unemployed prior to going on this.

then you also have the bit about it being completely voluntary, so why say it's only the people who are scared of losing the freedom they have to sit on the dole with the state paying for everything that object?

why would they be objecting if it's voluntary. if they're on it they only have themselves to blame for volunteering. and if they want to just carry on sitting there, then they wouldn't be stupid enough to volunteer.

the way you're making it sound is that it's mandatory.

Quote:
also ,unlike you
I think I have read a lot more.
I even read when the DWP said there is no evidence to show that 'work experience' creates jobs.
and that it reduces employment chances by limiting the time available for job search.
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote