View Single Post
Old 25-02-2012, 11:57   #96
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Sainsbury's pull out of 'Work for your benefits scheme'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Out of the 34000 who have been through this Work Experience scheme, less than 200 have had any form of sanctions imposed.
Where did you read that?

---------- Post added at 10:57 ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 ----------

Quote:
These letters below highlight the difference between something that is really is ‘entirely voluntary’ and something that is not. If something is ‘voluntary’ then why are Version 1 and Version 2 of these letters so different?
Version 1: One with threats of destitution benefit loss sanctions.
Version 2: For 16 to 17 years that is ‘entirely voluntary’ because it has no threats of destitution benefit loss sanctions
The point being that 'yes' it may be common knowledge now that it's voluntary for the first week. but it's been shown and proven that claimants were not told that it's voluntary for the first week. they can pull out with no risk of losing their benefits.

up until now.

http://www.consent.me.uk/workexperience/
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote