Quote:
Originally Posted by pabscars
Frustrated comments by people with more than inferior VM broadband are inevitable when they read result's like this Maggy, as it just rubs their noses in it. However what I would like to see from the VM results is just how many areas during the testing periods suffered from over subbing/utilisation, as I suspect they probably didn't. which in real terms may paint a considerably different picture.
|
It's not VM that cherry picks, Samknows who recruit the panellists reject any applications from oversubbed areas, they also reject anyone other than extremely light users, which already biases against heavily used areas even if they didn't explicitly reject them too