Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy
Either way it's a lot more gender specific than qasdfdsaq  |
That was part of the whole point, qasdfdsaq's not meant to be anything specific, apart from me.
---------- Post added at 16:47 ---------- Previous post was at 16:46 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy
No idea what shipped with the superhub but previous to that all their modems were only specified upto 100Mb (and even lower in most cases) so cat5 was perfectly adequate.. In fact cat5 in 1-2m patch length will probably do perfectly well at gigabit
|
VMNG300 has a gigabit port and works fine up to 200mb.
Cat 5 is *supposed* to work up to 100m (i.e. the full length) in gigabit mode, in theory...
The only problem is when el-cheapo cables with half the conductors missing are supplied. In that case, gigabit will simply not work at all - but in all other cases Cat5 will do fine for Gigabit.
As Ignition once said, sucky quality cable is sucky quality cable. Crap quality Cat5e is just certified to suck all the way to 350Mhz.
[Edit]
Found it:
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35225441-post11.html