View Single Post
Old 11-01-2012, 13:30   #16
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Think broadband monitor

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Doing it your way and running throttled back downloads for long periods makes your charts meaningless to everybody including you as have no idea what it may look like if you weren't downloading at all and it's only when your connection is idle that the chart throws any light on just the connection.
I don't use any QoS or throttling on my downloads. They just don't affect my chart for some reason, allowing my chart to be meaningful since it looks pretty much the same as it would have if my connection was idle.

To be absolutely precise scientifically speaking your connection would be affected simply by the fact that you're pinging it, so you'd never know what it would *actually* look like in truth as the creation of the chart itself modifies the outcome of the chart. The effect might be microscopic, but then again so is the effect of my downloads, even at full speed.

---------- Post added at 13:30 ---------- Previous post was at 13:26 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
yes the vmng300 wont ever cycle the upstream channels.
Ah, now I understand your other post.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote