View Single Post
Old 09-01-2012, 16:35   #29
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Can you see something wrong here? *Video*

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Easy - either BT will put in more capacity or it will get congested.

The difference is that congestion on Infinity will be slow to build so capacity planning should be easy because it's 1:1 back to the cab then at least a 1Gb pipe. With VM a single user can tip a local area from acceptable to dire because of the small pipes. 8 bonded downstreams will help for sure but there will probably still be oversubscribed areas.
[sparks flamewar about BT vs VM's capacity management]

In any case, I would postulate upstream on BT will always be infinitely (pardon the pun) better than VM's, due to the far lower contention - and as you say, symmetric backhaul - to the exchange. Hence how ~6mbps DSL still beats VM's 50mb cable almost by an order of magnitude when it comes to upstream stability.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote