View Single Post
Old 09-01-2012, 15:57   #15
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Mod
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,942
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: London 2012 - Overhyped?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymouse View Post
It took me ages to read the '2012' logo as 2012 - I don't know if that says more about the logo or me. My involvement will be limited to my dad recording for me the only event I'm interested in, viz. the archery...if they even show it, that is.

It is overhyped, and the only part of Britain that'll benefit - if indeed it does - will be London...as usual. Ye gods, you'd think the UK was nothing but London with the rest just tacked-on, wouldn't you?
Where else would Britain host the Olympics? London had the hotels, the airports, the trains and so on already there. All that was needed was the Olympic park itself and Stratford International (the latter not really needed either). We were up against New York and Paris, London was our best chance at competing with them.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote