View Single Post
Old 08-01-2012, 13:21   #16
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Uddingston upload speed improvement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewcrawford23 View Post
that makes sense, i suppos ei was stupidly thinking because the backlink to uddingston might nto cope with teh capicty that they need ot ugprade uddingsotn first before the speed could be available at castlecary but i get what your saying amkes sense now that it would only be the cmts that is the problem
The backhaul is symmetrical, the DOCSIS network isn't, backhaul is a non-issue for the upstream uplifts it becomes a 'problem' with downstream upgrades.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote